TASEER AMIN NAIK AND ANR. v. ASHOK KR PRADHAN,S.E.HYDRAULIC,DODA
CPSW/194/2014 · 2025-12-19
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14095 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14095 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 28
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case : CPSW No. 194/2014 in SWP No. 789/2014
Taseer Amin Naik and another …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None. V/s
Ashok Kumar Pradhan ... Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffer, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr.AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER 19.12.2025
The petitioners pray for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for willful defiance of Judgment/Order dated March 24, 2014 passed by the Writ Court in SWP No. 789/2014 & CMA No. 1120/2014 (Taseer Amin Naik and others Vs. State of J&K & Ors).
Vide order, referred to above, the Writ Court had disposed of the petition, preferred by the petitioners, with a direction to the respondent to consider the objection he had submitted against the Provisional Select List for the post of Work Supervisor, District Cadre Doda, issued pursuant to Advertisement dated September 21, 2013 and thereafter to issue final select list. And, pass a
consideration order within a specified time.
Learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset, has drawn the attention of the Court to the compliance report filed on behalf of the respondent. And, with reference to the averments set out in Para 2 thereof, she submits that the claim of the petitioners was considered and rejected by the Authorities vide a formal Order No. SHE/D/318 dated May 05, 2024 (R-1). That being so, nothing substantive survives in the petition and the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(
(ARUN PALLI)
CHIEF JUSTICE Jammu : 19.12.2025 Pawan Chopra/Secy
Pawan Chopra 2025.12.20 05:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document