SMT. LAXMI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
ABAIL/1211/2024 · 2025-03-21
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140943 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140943 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16492 Court No. - 15 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1211 of 2024 Applicant :- Smt. Laxmi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Dept. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Vipul Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Rajiv Kumar Verma, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No. 128 of 2024, under Sections 323, 504, 306 IPC, Police Station Baddupur, District Barabanki. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 21.04.2024 against the applicant, her husband and her cousin Ram Naresh, stating that all the accused persons had abused and beaten the informant's daughter aged about 20 years, on 20.04.2024. It is stated in the FIR that the applicant and her husband were demanding Rs. 1,40,000/- which was spent in treatment of the informant's wife and in marriage of his daughter Ram Devi. For this reason, the informant's daughter committed suicide by hanging her inside the informant's home at about 12:00 noon on 20.04.2024. 4. The applicant was granted interim anticipatory bail by means of an order dated 30.05.2024 and notice was issued to the
opposite party no. 2 after observing that from the material available on record, prima facie, there is no material to suggest abatement at the instance of the applicant as defined under Section 107 IPC. The office has reported on 15.10.2024 that notice issued to the opposite party no. 2 has been served personally but the opposite party no. 2 has not appeared before the Court to oppose the bail application. 5. The learned AGA has informed that investigation stands concluded and a charge sheet has already been submitted on
13.06.2024. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts, there is no good ground for this Court to take a view different from the view taken while passing the interim order dated 30.05.2024. The learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant has already furnished bail bonds in compliance of the interim order. 7.
In view of the aforesaid facts, the interim order dated 30.05.2024 is made absolute. The anticipatory bail application stands allowed in terms of the aforesaid interim order. . (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 21.3.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench