SMT. TILKA v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TAHSIL RUDAULI , AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/3040/2025 · 2025-05-21
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140942 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:30086
Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3040 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Tilka Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tahsil Rudauli , Ayodhya And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Laxmi Verma,Prabhakar Nath Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner Ms. Laxmi Verma states that she may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition on account of formal defects, with liberty to file fresh petition. The aforesaid has not been opposed. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Office is directed to return certified copies of the order(s) to the
learned counsel for the petitioner, after retaining photocopies of the same on record, as per rules.
Order Date :- 21.5.2025 ML/- Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench