Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14091 (KAR)

MOHAMMED HANEEF@ HANEEF v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/848/2025 · 2025-02-06

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5545 CRL.P No. 848 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 848 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. MOHAMMED HANEEF@ HANEEF AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS C/O. H IBRAHIM NO.3-55, DARKAS HOUSE, KAVALAKATTE POST, VTC KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 2. ABUSALI, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O. MAHAMMED BYARI, 3-81,N.C ROAD HOUSE KAVALAKATTE, BANTWAL-574 265. (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 3. ARIF, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, C/O. MAHAMMED, NO.3-73/1 N C ROAD HOUSE, KAVALAKATTE BANTWAL-574 265. (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 4. HAMZA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS C/O. MAHAMMED, 3-47/1H, DUMALIKE HOUSE, KAVALAKATTE POST, KAVALAMDUR VILLAGE BANTWAL-574 265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD) Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5545 CRL.P No. 848 of 2025 5. MOHAMMED IRSHAD @ IRSHAD AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED NO.3-155, KAVALKATTE HOUSE, KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 6. ARIF AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O. ABBAS NO.3-66, KURMALU HOUSE, KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 7. ABDUL RAHEEM @ RAHIM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O. IBRAHIM BYARI NO.3-64, DUMALIKE HOUSE, KAVALAKATTE POST, VTC KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 8. MOAHMMED IMRAN SHA @ IMRAN AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS C/O. ISUBU NO.3-59/1, DUMALIKE HOUSE, BELTHANKADY KAVALAKATTE POST, VTC KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 9. AHAMAD HUSSAIN @ HUSAIN AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS NANTAZ NANZIL NEAR RADHA NAIK HIGH SCHOOL, YENNEHOLE POST, MARNE UDUPI-574101 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 10. MOHAMMED IRFAN @ IRFAN AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O. YAKUB BYARI - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5545 CRL.P No. 848 of 2025 NO.3-73/18, ARKALIKE HOUSE, VTC KAVALAMUDUR BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 11. MOHAMMED SHAREEF @ SHAREEF AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS C/O. ADAM BYARI 3-57/4, DUMALIKE HOUSE, KAVALKATTE POST VTC KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 12. HYDER AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, NO 3-84, NC ROAD HOUSE, KAVALKATTE NOUSE, VTC KAVALAMUDUR, SANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD) 13. MAHANMAD MUSTHAFA @ MUSTHAFA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS S/O. ABDUL KHADAR NO.3-51, DARKAS HOUSE VTC KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). 14. IQBAL AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S/O. ABDUL KHADAR 3-41/3, DOOMALIKE HOUSE, VTCKAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD) 15. RAZAK AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS S/O, SULAIMAN NELL KAVALAMUDURU , BANTWAL 574785 (AS PER AADHAR CARD) 16. MOHAMMED JALLEL @ JALEEL AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O. MOHAMMED 3-76, N C ROAD - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:5545 CRL.P No. 848 of 2025 KAVALKATTE POST, VTC KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD) 17. HUSAIN BYARI @ HUSAINAR AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS S/O. IBRAHIM BYARI 3-68/A, DOOMALIKE HOUSE KAVALKATTE POST, VTC KAVALAMUDUR, BANTWAL-574265 (AS PER AADHAR CARD). …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED MONISH SOWKAR.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY STATION HOUSE OFFICE, PUNJALKATTE POLICE STATION, BELTHANGADY CIRCLE REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR. BANGALORE-560 001. 2. SAFIYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS W/O. LATE MOHAMMED SHAMEEM ARKALIKE HOUSE, KAVALAKATTE HOUSE KAVALAMUDOOR VILLAGE BANTWAL-574 265. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RASHMI JADHAV, ADDL. SPP FOR R-1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CC.NO.695/2023 ARISING OUT OF CRIME NO.38/2023 PERTAINING TO PUNJALKATTE POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 323, 504, 506 R/W SECTION 149 OF THE IPC, PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE COURT OF PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, BANTWAL D.K. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:5545 CRL.P No. 848 of 2025 ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the Criminal Petition. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. The Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to file an appropriate discharge application before the Trial Court, who shall consider the same, in accordance with law. Liberty is also reserved in favour of the petitioner to file an application seeking recalling of non-bailable warrant issued against them, which shall be considered by the Trial Court, in accordance with law. All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84