IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 146 NAVDEEP SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE HON’BLE M Present: Mr. N.P.S. Mann Mr. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for petitioner had been making interest, in terms of the schedule but the the amount due. He further submits that he shall be filing an appeal appellate authority manner. 2. Issue notice to the 3. At the asking of the Court, notice on behalf of the appellant files an appeal, the respondents shall not raise the issue of limitation. 4. Heard. 5. The petitioner filing an appeal within 15 days, the same decided on merits by the appellat thereafter. 06.11.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-32415-2025 DATE OF DECISION: NAVDEEP SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL r. N.P.S. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the had been making payments of the principal amount in terms of the schedule but the respondents . He further submits that he shall be filing an appeal appellate authority be directed to consider and deci Issue notice to the respondents. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate notice on behalf of the respondents and submits that in the event an appeal, the respondents shall not raise the issue of limitation. Heard. The petition is disposed of with a direction that in the petitioner filing an appeal within 15 days, the same decided on merits by the appellate authority, within a period of two months (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 06.11.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL , Advocate for the petitioner(s). Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate for the respondent/Mandi Board. the petitioner submits that although the of the principal amount along with respondents have wrongly calculated . He further submits that he shall be filing an appeal and the be directed to consider and decide the same in a time bound Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate accepts and submits that in the event that the an appeal, the respondents shall not raise the issue of limitation. of with a direction that in the event of the petitioner filing an appeal within 15 days, the same shall be considered and within a period of two months (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE the petitioner submits that although the along with have wrongly calculated and the a time bound accepts the event of the be considered and within a period of two months SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.11.06 19:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document