Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14090 (UTT)

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA v. UTTARAKHAND REALESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY

WPMS/669/2025 · 2025-12-09

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 09.12.2025 WPMS No. 669 of 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Aman Jot Singh Chaddha, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Monika Pant, Advocate for respondent No. 1 through video conferencing. Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for respondent Nos. 4, 5 and 6. Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate for respondent no. 3 through video conference. 2. Mr. Aman Jot Singh Chaddha, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that the dispute has now been amicably resolved between the parties. He therefore submitted that writ petition be permitted to be withdrawn. 3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 09.12.2025 Mahinder/