SURESH and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY. LOK NIRMAN and 2 ORS.
WRIA/9390/2006 · 2025-05-14
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140886 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140886 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28201
Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9390 of 2006 Petitioner :- Suresh And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy. Lok Nirman And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- A.M. Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C S C Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Sri A.M. Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after looking into the prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that writ petition has become infructuous, hence the same may be dismissed as such.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 14.5.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench