[2025:JHHC:30017] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8288 of 2025 ------ Jitendra Singh @ Golu Sahu @ Jitendar Singh, aged about 31 years, son of Bhagwanu Sahu @ Narayan Singh, Resident of House No.83, Bagunhatu, near Road No.6, D-Block, River Road, near Shankar Tasha, P.O.-Balidih and P.S.-Sidhgora, Town Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... …. Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Dilip Kr. Karmakar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.06 Dated- 25-09-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Sidhgora P.S. Case No.234 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.462 of 2025 registered under Section 103(1), 238 and 3(5) of the B.N..S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused person committed murder of Khusbu Kumari who is the sister-in-law of the petitioner and caused disappearance of the evidence of murder. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the deceased died because of hanging, by way of committing suicide and the post-mortem report suggests that there was no antemortem body injury; rather the death was due to hanging. It is further submitted that the co-accused person has been admitted to bail by co- ordinate Bench of this Court in B.A. No.6769 of 2025 vide order dated 08.08.2025. It is then submitted that except the suspicion, there is no other material to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 09.04.2025 as is evident from para-20 of the instant bail application and charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Jamshedpur, in connection with Sidhgora P.S. Case No.234 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.462 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 25.09.2025 Rohit/