1 2025:CGHC:14228 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 376 of 2025 Gendram S/o Shri Antram Patel Aged About 65 Years Village Urgapara, Silharipara Ko- rba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Ram Naresh Dubey Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division- Korba District- Korba (C.G.) 2 - G.R. Jangade Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Korba Division Dis- trict- Korba (C.G.)(Proposed Contemnors) ... Respondent(s) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Sourabh Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Deputy Advocate General --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 25.03.2025 1. The present contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of order of this Court dated 21.11.2024 passed in WPS No. 7530 of 2024. Vide order dated 21.11.2024 this Court has passed the following order/direction:- “Be that as it may, without commenting anything on the merits, this petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to make detailed representation before the concerned respondent/competent authority within the periiod of 30 days from the date of receipt of coy of this order with all necessary documents to substantiate their claim. In the event of filing of representation, on due verification, if the petitioner is found to be a similarly situated person, as in the case of Faguvaram 2 Patel (supra), his claim shall be decided by the respondents in light of judgment of Faguvaram Patel(supra) expeditiously preferably within the period of 90 days from the date of submission of the said representation.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the order passed by this court has not been complied with. 3. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents contended that the order passed by this court has already been complied with and in regard to this he placed on record the leave encashment of the petitioner and he also placed on record the copy of the treasury voucher slip. 4. Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent and the documents place on record by the learned counsel for the respondent, this court is of the considered view that the order has duly been complied with and there remains no willful disobedience on the part of the respondents. 5. Subsequently, the present contempt petition against the respondents is closed and is accordingly disposed of. sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge alfiza