SRI G K SHANTHARAJU v. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
RP/29/2023 · 2025-01-27
H T Narendra Prasad
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14082 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14082 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3460 RP No. 29 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 29 OF 2023 BETWEEN:
SRI G K SHANTHARAJU, S/O LATE KAPANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC:PROP: OF VINAYAKA ELECTRICAL ENTERPRISES, R/AT NO.36, GHBCS LAYOUT, NEAR SUB-REGISTRAR'S OFFICE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BENGALURU-560 079. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAJARAM T, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2.
THE ENGINEER MEMBER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
3.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020.
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3460 RP No. 29 of 2023
4.
THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION, RECALL AND REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 08.02.2022 PASSED IN W.P. NO.6095/2015 (BDA) IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO PASS IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the review petition.
2. The memo is placed on record.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3460 RP No. 29 of 2023
3. The review petition is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the dismissal of the petition, I.A.1/2023 filed for condonation of delay does not survive for consideration and the same is also dismissed.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
VP