CWP-11862 IN TH 102+218 Subhash Cha Union of Indi CORAM: Present : HARPREET CM-8762-CW CPC for plac allowed, as p respondents N 1 862-2021 N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGA CWP-11 Date of h Chander and others VERSUS of India and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HA None for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate for **** REET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) CWP-2025 The present application has be r placing on record short reply on beh In view of the grounds mentione d, as prayed for, subject to all just exce dents No.2 and 3 is ordered to be taken Registry is directed to place the NJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 11862-2021(O&M) ate of Decision: December 10, 2025 .....Petitioner SUS ...Responden E HARPREET SINGH BRAR ate for respondents No.2 and 3. has been filed under Section 151 of n behalf of respondents No.2 and 3. ntioned in the application, the same is st exceptions. Short reply on behalf of e taken on record. ce the same at the appropriate place. ioners ondents 51 of d 3. ame is alf of PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.12.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11862 Main 1. of the Consti or order in th claim of the grant the rev passed by Ho 2. on behalf of for revised pe fresh PPO ha petition and t 3. last of hearin 4. taken in the rendered infr 5. disposed of. December 10 P.C 2 862-2021 The present writ petition has be Constitution of India with a prayer for in the nature of mandamus directin f the petitioners for grant of benefit o he revised pension to them at the ea by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Learned counsel for respondents alf of respondents No.2 and 3 and sub ised pension has been accepted and the PO have also been issued. As such, n and the same may be rendered infruc There is no representation on b hearing also there was no representatio In view of the above and takin in the reply, the present petition is ed infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applicat ed of. 10, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned. : Whether Reportable. : has been filed under Article 226/227 er for issuance of an appropriate writ irecting the respondents to allow the enefit of pension at higher wages and the earliest in terms of the judgment ndia in R.C. Gupta’s case. ndents No.2 and 3 refers to reply filed nd submits that the petitioners’ claim and they are getting higher pension, as such, nothing survives in the present infructuous. n on behalf of the petitioner. On the entation on behalf of the petitioner. d taking into consideration the stand tion is disposed of as having been plication(s), if any, shall also stands (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 6/227 writ w the es and gment y filed claim , as resent n the stand been stands RAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.12.11 17:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document