[2025:RJ-JP:29686-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Review Petition (Writ) No. 108/2025 Ex Sep Mahavir Singh S/o Shri Hardayal Singh, R/o Village Sardarpura, Post Hamir Was, District Churu Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. Uoi, Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Defense, South Block, Govt. Of India, New Delhi-110 011 2. The Pcda (P), Prayagraj, Up-211014 3. The Oic Records, The Jat Regiment, Bareilly-243001 (Up) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Anjali Minocha For Respondent(s) : Mr. Raghav Sharma for Mr. Samit Bishnoi HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 04/08/2025 1. Heard on review petition. 2. This court while passing the order dated 04.03.2025, observed as under:- “7. A perusal of the record reveals that it is an admitted position that the petitioner was enrolled in the Army on 07.05.1977 and on the basis of a complaint regarding fraudulent enrolment, he was discharged from service on 14.02.1986 after serving a show cause notice. In response to the notice, the petitioner admitted that he got himself enrolled in the Army through unfair means by altering his age. The claim regarding disability pension has been raised by the petitioner by filing OA after 27 years of his discharge from service. No evidence much less a document has been [2025:RJ-JP:29686-DB] (2 of 2) [WRW-108/2025] placed on record by the petitioner to show that he ever approached the respondents or Zila Sainik Kalyan Board for redressal of his grievance. 8. The judgments relied upon by the petitioner do not help the petitioner and turn on their own facts as no application for condonation of delay supported by affidavit was filed by the petitioner along with OA. Thus, in our view, the tribunal after appreciating entire material on record has rightly passed the order impugned rejecting the OA, which does not warrant any interference by this Court in exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction.” 3. We have gone through the order dated 04.03.2025. 4. In view of the findings recorded by the Coordinate Bench of this court in para 7 & 8 of order, no case is made out for interference by this court in the present review petition. 6. Hence, review petition is dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J Anu /49