Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14078 (AP)

Nadimpalll Venkatraju v. Sri. Shashi Bhushan kumar

CC/1163/2022 · 2025-08-21

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010171842022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO:1163/2022 Between: 1. NADIMPALLL VENKATRAJU, S/O.SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED. MAJOR, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O. OBULANKA, RAVULAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DIST. 2. DASARI SRINIVAS, S/O. GANGAIAH, AGED. 47 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O.1-146, BOGGULAMMAPETA, WARD NO.1, ATILLI, WEST GODAVARI. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR, AGE MAJOR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRESENTLY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. C NARAYAN REDDY, AGE. MAJOR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, MEDIUM AND MINOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST., 3. V PRASANNA KUMAR, AGE. MAJOR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETIITONER, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, AT ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. 4. P SRIRAMA KRISHNA, AGE. MAJOR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETIITONER,, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DIST. NJS,J C.C No.1163 of 2022 2 5. P NAGARJUN RAO B E, AGE. MAJOR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETIITONER, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER. DRAINAGE DIVISION, BHIMAVARAM, WEST GODAVARI DIST. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of contempt of courts Act for wilfully disobeying the orders of Hon'ble Sri. Justice M.Venkata Ramana, passed in VW No. 24850/2021, dated 23-12-2021, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to allow the petition to implead i) Sri. G.Sai Prasad, ii) Sri. T Venkata Naga Anji Rathna Kumar, iii) Sri C.Naga Rani, IAS., iv) Sri. Ch.Deva Prakash, and v) Sri. P. Subrahmanyeswarao as respondent no. 6, 7, 8, 9 & 10 in CC No. 1163 of 2022 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K L N SWAMY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2. SUSHMA YAGANTI 3. S SIVA KUMARI NJS,J C.C No.1163 of 2022 3 The Court made the following: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners, that the orders dated 23.12.2021 passed in W.P No.24850 of 2021 have been complied with. 2. Recording the same, this Contempt Case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:22.08.2025 Ksj