Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:30171 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5565 of 2025 Petitioner :- Fareed Ahmad Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Ministry Communication New Delhi And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avadhesh Mishra,Naseem Ahamad Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Dwijendra Mishra Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Sri Naseem Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Shivangi Kapoor, Advocate holding brief of Sri Dwijendra Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 and Sri Anand Dwivedi, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no.2 and 3 for making payment of admitted amount of PL dues at superannuation INR 7,28,833/-, PL for period 2016-2023 INR 3,78,312.80/- total amount INR 11,07,145.80/- and amount of PF with interest on September 2024 INR 2,48,429.30/- in favour of the petitioner alongwith interest as applicable within a period to be fixed by this Hon'ble court, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., ITI Ltd. through M.D./Chairman Bangalore and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.2, i.e., ITI Ltd. through M.D./Chairman Bangalore ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 21.5.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench