IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 295 MOHIT STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Pooja Nay Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kundra, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed for dated 23.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 325, 341, 506 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase 1, Mohali, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P 2 . Thi appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, learned Magistrate IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA Mr. Gurdeep Singh Nehra, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kundra, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed for dated 23.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 325, 341, 506 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase 1, Mohali, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P This Court vide order dated 10.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Addl. Civil Judge, SAS Nagar Mohali and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Magistrate has submitted report dated 22.04.2025 to the IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.3203 of 2025 Date of decision: 01.05.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioner. Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab. Mr. Bhupinder Singh Kundra, Advocate for respondent No.2. The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No.59 dated 23.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 325, 341, 506 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase 1, Mohali, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P-2). s Court vide order dated 10.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the order, parties have appeared before the Addl. Civil Judge, SAS Nagar Mohali and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, has submitted report dated 22.04.2025 to the effect that the quashing of FIR No.59 dated 23.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 325, 341, 506 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase 1, Mohali, and all the subsequent proceedings arising s Court vide order dated 10.03.2025 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the order, parties have appeared before the Addl. Civil Judge, SAS Nagar Mohali and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, effect that the Jyoti 2025.05.01 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 this petition is allowed and FIR No.59 dated 23.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 325, 341 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P 01.05.2025 Jyoti-IV CRM-M No.3203 of 2025 compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303 this petition is allowed and FIR No.59 dated 23.04.2024 registered under Sections 323, 325, 341, 506 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase 1, Mohali and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 22.05.2024 (Annexure P-2) are quashed qua the petitioner. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No M No.3203 of 2025 -2- compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.59 dated 23.04.2024 registered under , 506 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase 1, Mohali and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise 2) are quashed qua the petitioner. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2 In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of of Punjab and and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme , this petition is allowed and FIR No.59 dated 23.04.2024 registered under , 506 and 34 of IPC at Police Station Phase 1, Mohali and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise Jyoti 2025.05.01 17:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document