SHRI NARAYAN BUILDHOME PVT LTD v. GIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD AND ORS
CW/8250/2010 · 2025-04-01
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14076 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:14676] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8250/2010 Shri Narayan Buildhome Pvt Ltd having its registered office at E- 72, Real’s Avi, II Floor, Ambabari Jaipur through its director Amit Srivastava Aged about 30 years, S/o Late Shri Mahendra Shanker Srivastava R/o C-65 Amba Bari Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus
1. GIC Housing Finance Ltd having its registered office at Universal Insurance Building, 3rd Floor, Sir P.M. Road, Fort, Mumbai through its authorized officer
2. GIC Housing Finance Ltd. Through its authorized officer Branch 138, Ganpati Plaza, 1st Floor, M.I. Road, Jaipur
3. Bhupendra Yadav/Shalendra Yadav Aged about 29 years, S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Yadav R/o 2868, V Crossing, Ghee Walon Ka Rasta Johri Bazar, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
4. The District Collector and Magistrate, Collectorate, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
5. SHO, Police Station Kalwar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 01/04/2025 On last date, i.e., 26.03.2025, following order was passed:
“This writ petition is directed against the notice dated 01.10.2009 issued by the respondents no.1 and 2 under Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity, ‘Act of 2002’), the order dated 22.02.2010 passed by the
[2025:RJ-JP:14676] (2 of 2) [CW-8250/2010] respondent no.4 under Section 14 of the Act of 2002 as also for quashing and setting aside the proceeding and action of dispossessing the petitioner from the subject premises and to direct the respondents no.1 and 2 to restore possession of the subject flat to the petitioner with compensation and cost. None appears for the petitioner even in second round. However, in the interest of justice, it is granted one more opportunity to present its case. List the matter on 28.03.2025 at top of the list.” Today also, none appears for the petitioner even in second round. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /160