Suresh Kumar versus Anjali Thakur CMP(M) No.693 of 2025 10.07.2025 Present: Mr. R.L.Chaudhary, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Sahil Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent. CMP (M) No.693/2025 Learned counsel for the respondent states that he has filed power of attorney, however, report of the Registry is to the contrary. Learned counsel to follow up with the Registry. By medium of this application, the applicant has sought to condone the delay of 84 days that has crept-up in filing the instant appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with the fact that same is not opposed, we find sufficient reasons to condone the aforesaid delay. Ordered accordingly. The application stands disposed of. Appeal be registered. F.A.O. (FC) No. of 2025 Before the appellant can be heard in the matter, let him pay entire maintenance amount to the respondent within a period of four weeks, failing which, this appeal shall be dismissed for want of compliance. List on 07.08.2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) July 10, 2025 Judge (yogesh/pankaj)