Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 140747 (ALL)

VIDHYADHAR SHUKLA and ANR. v. D.I.O.S. BARABANKI and 5 ORS.

WRIA/7250/2006 · 2025-05-12

Brij Raj Singh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:27782 Court No. - 28 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7250 of 2006 Petitioner :- Vidhyadhar Shukla And Anr. Respondent :- D.I.O.S. Barabanki And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Siddharth Dhaon Counsel for Respondent :- C.Sc..,Ajay Pratap Singh,Sharad Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J. 1. Case called out in revised list. 2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to press this writ petition. However, learned Standing Counsel is present. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2006 and since then it has remained pending. It appears that petitioners have lost their interest to pursue their case. Apart from it, by efflux of time, writ petition has become infructuous. 4. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) Order Date :- 12.5.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench