Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14072 (CHH)

SHRI SHYAM PULSES v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1582/2022 · 2025-03-24

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:14030 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1582 of 2022 1 - Shri Shyam Pulses Through Its Partner Subhash Murarka, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Khasra No. 304, 303/1, Opposite Dilbagh Dhaba, Bilaspur Road Dhaneli (Rawa), Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Limited, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Commercial Complex, North West Corner, Sector-27, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Deputy Manager (Purchase And Operation), Chhattisgarh Medical Services Corporation Limited, Chhattisgarh Housing Board, Commercial Complex, North West Corner, Sector-27, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents No. 2 & 3 : Mr. Trivikram Nayak, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/03/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the payment has already been received by the petitioner as such the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed and with the efflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat