Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14070 (GAU)

BIRJYOTI SING BRAHMA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/3822/2018 · 2025-05-04

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010126542018 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3822/2018 BIRJYOTI SING BRAHMA S/O. BHUBAN SING BRAHMA, R/O. AMBARI, P.O. MUSHALPUR, DISTRICT- BAKSA (BTAD), ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. THROUGH- THE COMMISSIONER, TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006. 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER DISTRICT INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE CENTRE BAKSA MUSHALPUR DISTRICT- BAKSA (BTAD) ASSAM PIN- 781343 3:BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER P.O. AND DISTRICT- KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370. 4:THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR (CHD) INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR P.O. KOKRAJHAR PIN CODE 783370 DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR Page No.# 2/2 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S SEAL, MS. S KANUNGOE,MS. J CHETTRY Advocate for the Respondent : SC, INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, SC, BTC BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 05.05.2025 Ms. J Chetry, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petitioner does not wish to press this writ petition any further. Mr. S. Bora, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 & 4 and Mr. H. Kalita, learned counsel for the respondent no.1 do not have any objection. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant