Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10440-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 1525 OF 2025
24TH NOVEMBER, 2025
Rinki and another
…… Petitioners
Versus
Senior Superintendent of Police, Udham Singh Nagar & others
…… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel
Counsel for the respondents : Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand / respondent Nos. 1 and 2
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri G. Narendar)
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, and learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 2)
It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to the same religion and that they developed a liking for each other, which has culminated into marriage, and now both the petitioners are living together. Since the family 1
2025:UHC:10440-DB members of the first petitioner are against this marriage, they are giving out threats to kill both the petitioners. Petitioners submit that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and limb from the family members of the first petitioner, and hence they are before this Court praying for protection. 3)
The documents on record reveal that both the petitioners are majors, and it is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the parties have solemnized marriage on 12.11.2025, as per Hindu rites and rituals at Maa Balsundari Devi, Shri Chaiti Dham, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, which fact is also evident from the marriage certificate issued by the priest of said temple which is enclosed as Annexure-1 to the petition. Copy of Aadhaar Cards of both the petitioners are also enclosed as Annexure-2 and Annexure-3 to the petition. 4)
In that view of the matter, and in view of the ruling of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs State of U.P. and another, (2006) 5 SCC 475, the petitioners have made out a case for grant of protection. 5)
The Station House Officer, Police Station Kunda, District Udham Singh Nagar is directed to assess the threat, if any, to the life and limb of the petitioners, and provide necessary protection, if it is found that there is a threat to 2
2025:UHC:10440-DB the life and limb of the petitioners. The SHO is further
directed to summon the private respondents, and such other persons, who are inimically placed towards the marriage of the petitioners, and counsel them, in accordance with law. 6)
The writ petition stands ordered accordingly. 7)
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
________________
G. NARENDAR, C.J.
_________________ SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.
Dt: 24TH NOVEMBER, 2025 Negi
3 HIMANS HU NEGI Digitally signed by HIMANSHU NEGI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=bb3b60774012c1ef1dae20d13aaf11 6e73351fdaf6878326386908a7f90d5757, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=75BD9D0FB7F4A80990FC51A 722A6BC552D470EB4FD2F88DDF7C18DB2A1 524A4D, cn=HIMANSHU NEGI Date: 2025.12.03 10:49:29 +05'30'