AJAZ AHMED KHAN v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, JAMMU AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2835/2025 · 2025-10-13
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14066 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14066 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:- WP(C) No. 2835/2025
Ajaz Ahmed Khan .....Petitioner (s)
Through: Ashfaq Ah. Khan, Adv.
vs
U. T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Adv vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 13.10.2025
01.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that prior to filing of instant petition, he already preferred a representation before the respondents for redressal of their grievances, which have been projected in the present petition as well and pursuant to the said representation, grievances of the petitioner stand redressed and he is under instructions not to pursue this writ petition any further.
02. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of as the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
13.10.2025
Rakesh
S. No. 196 Rakesh Kumar 2025.10.14 09:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document