- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24677 WP No. 2054 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 2054 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR SUNDER SHETTY S/O MR BHOJA SHETTY AGED 56 YEARS, GUDAL BETU MUDRADI VILLAGE HEBRI TALUK-576 112. 2. MR SUDHAKAR SHETTY S/O MR BHOJA SHETTY AGE 54 YEARS, AMITH COMPOUND TMEPLE ROAD VITTLA-574 243. 3. MR. SURESH SHETTY S/O MR BHOJA SHETY AGE 52 YEARS GUDAL BETTU MUDRADI VILALGE HEBBRI TALUK-576 112. 4. MR SUBASH SHETTY S/O MR BHOJA SHETTY AGED 42 YEARS GUDAL BETTU MUDRADI VILALGE HEBRI TALUK-576 112. 5. MR SUDEEP BHOJA SHETTY Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24677 WP No. 2054 of 2020 S/O MR BHOJA SHETTY AGE 40 YEARS, SHOP NO.401, HOTEL MANJUNATH OPP OLD PETROL BUNK, JUVARI NAGAR GOA-403 110. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K SHASHIKANTH PRASAD.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASST COMMISSIONER AND CHAIRMAN COURT OF MAINTENANCE KUNDAPURA SUB DIVISION KUNDAPURA-576 201. 2. MR BHOJA SHETTY S/O SURYANNA SHETTY GUDAL BETTU, MUDRADI VILLAGE HEBRI TALUK-576 112. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. H.G. SANDHYA VIJAYAKUMAR FOR R2; SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 04.12.2019 PASSED BY THE R-1 ANENXURE-A THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24677 WP No. 2054 of 2020 ORAL ORDER 1. Petitioners is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: '' (a) Set-aside the order dated 04-12-2019 passed by the First Respondent in CDS MAG SR 30/2018-19 [ANNEXURE-A] (b) Grant such other relief/s, as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant, under the circumstance of the petition, in the interest of Justice.'' 2. During the pendency of the petition, respondent No.2 has expired and a copy of the death certificate has been produced by the petitioners. What is challenged in the present proceedings is the maintenance amount ordered by the respondent No.1 in favour of the respondent No.2 payable by the petitioners. Since respondent No.2 has expired, the petition has been rendered infructuous. Petition is dismissed as such. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE RL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26