1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 418 of 2024 ---------- Nirmal Shashi Tirkey ………… Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sri Ajay Kumar Singh, S/o not known to the petitioner, the Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Dist.-Ranchi 3.Sri Prabhat Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioner, the Inspector General of Police, Special Branch, D.P.R.D. Building, Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand, Dist.-Ranchi 4.Sri Kartik S., S/o not known to the petitioner, the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Special Branch, D.P.R.D. Building, Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand Dist.-Ranchi 5.Sri Ajay Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioner, the Superintendent of Police, Special Branch, D.P.R.D. Building, Police Head Quarter, Dhurwa, Ranchi, Jharkhand, Dist.-Ranchi 6.Smt. Vandana Badal, W/o not known to the petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Prison and Disaster Management, Govt. of Jharkhand, Dist.-Ranchi ………… Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Chanchal Jain, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, AC to GP-I ---------- 06/ 14.01.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that substantial compliance has been made. 2. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, it appears that substantial compliance has been made and as such no contempt is made out against the opposite parties. The same is hereby dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. 4. Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if aggrieved. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) Kunal/Rohit/-