Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14064 (KAR)

MR. HENRY COUTINHO v. MR. VASANTH KAMATH

WP/6955/2020 · 2025-07-01

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23367 W.P. No.6955/2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.6955/2020 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MR. HENRY COUTINHO AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS S/O LATE RAYMOND COUTINHO R/AT GC-1 GANESH SAGAR APARTMENT 1ST CROSS ROAD SHIVABAGH, KADRI MANGALURU 575002. REP. BY VIVIAN SEQUEIRA S/O LATE JOSEPH HILARY SEQUEIRA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT. BELMONT, HARIPADAVU YEYYADI, MANGALURU-575008. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. JAYALAKSHMI K.B. ADV., [ABSENT]) AND: 1. MR. VASANTH KAMATH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS S/O LATE GOPAL KRISHNA KAMATH R/AT MAHAMAYA 2ND CROSS ROAD SHIVABAGH, KADRI KANKANADY POST MANGALURU 575002. 2. MR. N.M.A. SIDDIQ AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS S/O LATE MOHAMMED BEARY R/AT NO. DOOR NO.8-14-1206/1 Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court of karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23367 W.P. No.6955/2020 CPC COMPOUND KUDROLI, MANGALURU 570023. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY INTERFERING WITH THE ORDER DTD 30.11.2019 PASSED ON IA NO.7/2019 IN OS NO.35/2018 FILED UNDER SECTION 33 AND 34 OF KARNATAKA STAMP ACT R/W SECTION 13 RULE 8 OF CPC ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE JMFC, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA, VIDE ANNX-A & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioner when the matter is called in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session. 2. The order dated 24.06.2025 reads as under: "There is no representation for the petitioner. Even on 19.06.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. However, to provide one more opportunity, re- list on 01.07.2025. It is made clear that, if the petitioner does not appear on the next date of hearing, appropriate orders will be passed." - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23367 W.P. No.6955/2020 3. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26