2025:JHHC:14456 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 4457 of 2025 Sanjit Das, aged about 32 years, son of Jagdev Mahra, resident of Village Pathara, PO & PS-Pathrol, District-Deoghar … Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) :Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State :Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. PP -------- Order No.02 /Dated: 3rd June 2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) PS Case No. 41 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S Act, 2023 and Sections 66(B) 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the Information & Technology Amendment Act, 2008, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cogent evidence has been collected by the investigating officer showing that the petitioner earned money through cyber-crime. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 13.03.2025 as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Spl. PP opposes the prayer for bail. 5. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) PS Case No. 41 of 2025. 2025:JHHC:14456 2 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial Court and he shall not threaten any witness and shall cooperate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit