Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 140622 (ALL)

RAMA SHANKAR GUPTA v. OM PRAKASH VERMA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR U.P. GOVT. EMPLOYEES WELFARE CORPORATION LKO. AND OTHERS

CAPL/1340/2022 · 2025-03-03

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12598 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1340 of 2022 Applicant :- Rama Shankar Gupta Opposite Party :- Om Prakash Verma Executive Director U.P. Govt. Employees Welfare Corporation Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Satendra Nath Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- Mahendra Pratap Singh,Rahul Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Sri Anuj Kumar Pandey, Finance and Accounts Officer, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow who is respondent no. 2 in the present contempt application is present and has submitted that he is Chief Finance Officer, Vidhan Sabha and he was given the additional charge of the post of Finance and Accounts Officer, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow in the year 2022 and subsequently he was also given the officiating charge of Executive Director, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow but in February, 2025, the charge of Executive Director has been taken as new incumbent has joined on 19.02.2025 as Executive Director but he is still having the officiating charge of Finance and Accounts Officer, U.P. Government Employees Welfare Corporation, Lucknow. Learned counsel for respondent has submitted that the compliance affidavit filed in CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 766 of 2022 (In re: Smt. Usha Agarwal vs. Om Prakash Verma, Executive Director, U.P. Govt. Empolyees Welfare Corporation Lko. And Others) shall be read in the present contempt application also. It is further submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order dated 15.12.2021 passed in W.P. No. 28078 (SS) of 2021 an amount of Rs. 7,43,566/- has been paid to the applicant. On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that though the aforesaid payment has been made but after making certain deductions (festive and incentive advance) which was taken by the applicant and which cannot be recovered from him and has further submitted that otherwise, for all practical purposes, the judgment and order passed by the writ Court has been complied with as such, the present contempt application has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous but liberty may be given to the applicant to raise his grievance in the pending writ petition. In view of above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous with the aforesaid liberty. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench