Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:13461] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3762/2012 Radha Mohan Gupta S/o Late Shri Srinarian Gupta, C/o House No. 80/419, Shankaracharya Marg, Mansarovar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. Rajasthan Housing Board Through Its Chairman, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur
2. Commissioner, Rajasthan Housing Board, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur
3. Dy. Commissioner- II, Rajasthan Housing Board, Sfs, Mansarovar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha, Sr. Advocate For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 25/03/2025
1. Instant civil writ petition under Article 226/227 of Constitution of India was preferred by the petitioner, feeling aggrieved by the order dated 03.11.2011 issued by the Estate Officer from the office of Deputy Commissioner-II, Rajasthan Housing Board, Jaipur.
2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner admits that the petitioner has been allotted an alternate plot House No.69/103 in lieu of 69/61(C) but since the alternate plot is smaller in size than the previous plot, hence petitioner claims refund of the excess amount. However, the claim of the refund of petitioner has been rejected vide order dated 03.11.2011,
[2025:RJ-JP:13461] (2 of 2) [CW-3762/2012] observing that the amount demanded from the petitioner for alternative plot was according to the Rules.
3. Counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the writ petition for some time and having instructions from the petitioner, does not want to press the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J TN/25