Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14058 (GAU)

APU BAYAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1327/2025 · 2025-07-22

Mitali Thakuria

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010126362025 2025:GAU-AS:9422 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1327/2025 APU BAYAN S/O- MONORANJAN BAYAN, R/O- DARANDHA, P.S- DISPUR, DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN -781022 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MEDHI, S YESMIN,MR P SONOWAL,MR K THAKUR Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER Date : 23-07-2025 Heard Mr. K. Thakur, the learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. N. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State respondent. Page No.# 2/2 2. This is an application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, who is apprehending arrest in connection with Dispur P. S. Case No. 468/2025 registered under Sections 69 of BNS, 2023. 3. Case Diary received. Perused the same. 4. It is submitted by Mr. Thakur that after obtaining the order of pre-arrest bail on 12.06.2025 the petitioner appeared before the I/O and cooperated in investigation and his statement is also recorded u/s 183 BNSS. He is further ready and willing to cooperate with the I/O in further investigation of the case, if he is granted the privilege of pre-arrest bail. 5. Ms. N. Das, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted in this regard that the petitioner is cooperating in investigation of this case and his statement is also recorded u/s 183 BNSS. 6. Considering this aspect of the case and the conduct of the petitioner, I find that custodial interrogation may not be required for the interest of investigation. 7. Accordingly, the order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 12.06.2025 is hereby made absolute with same terms and conditions. 8. In terms of above, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. 9. The Case Diary be sent back. JUDGE Comparing Assistant