Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14054 (AP)

Mr. koranal Uma Maheswararao v. Mr. Madala Koteswara Rao

CMA/299/2024 · 2025-09-14

Challa Gunaranjan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010171132024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 299/2024 Between: 1. MR. KORANAL UMA MAHESWARARAO, S/O K. VENKATESWARARAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, R/O NIDAMANURU VILLAGE, D.NO 9 -10/A, SANRTHI NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA RURAL MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. MR MADALA KOTESWARA RAO, S/o Venkateswara rao, Hindu Aged about 52 years, R/o Nidamanuru Vilaage, Vijayawada Rural Mandal, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersPetitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal having been aggrieved by the Order dated 21/10/2021 passed in lA No. 860 of 2018 in OS.No 22 of 2018, on the file of VIII Additional District Judge At Vijayawada IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the 2 petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 671 days in filing the above C.M.A. in OS No 22 of 2018, dated 21/10/2021 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge At Vijayawada and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the order dated 21.10.2021 in lA 860/2018 in OS No 22/2018 on the file of VIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. G N V PULLA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN I.A.No.1 of 2024 IN/AND CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 299/2024 JUDGMENT: This Court, by order dated 24.06.2024, has issued notice to the respondents and also permitted to take out personal notice. On 21.06.2024, at request of learned counsel for the appellant, for filing proof of service, the matter has been posted to 28.06.2024. On 28.07.2024, request has been made informing that aforesaid personal notice, as directed earlier, was not taken out on respondents and therefore sought permission for taking out fresh notice once again. 2. On 29.08.2024, there was no representation for appellant. Even today there is no representation for appellant. It appears that appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal, as despite being granted multiple opportunities, even notice has not been taken out on respondents. 3. In view of the same, I.A.No.1 of 2024 seeking to condone the delay of 671 days in filing the appeal and also the Civil 4 Miscellaneous Appeal are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 15.09.2025 ANS 5 219 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 299/2024 Date: 15.09.2025 ANS