COCP No.342 of 2025 IN TH 183 RANJIT SINGH Vs GURKIRAT KIR CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. G for th Mr. S HARKESH MAN 1. Lear Deputy Superinte respect to the rec two weeks from t the delayed disbu thereafter. 2. In vi counsel for the pe 3. Dism 4. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioner tow listing of revival a February 19, 20 Atik Wheth Wheth 025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De INGH T KIRPAL SINGH AND OTHERS ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Gopal Singh Nahel, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, Asstt. A.G., P **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned State counsel on instructi perintendent, Central Jail, Faridkot su he recoveries being effected from the from today. Learned State counsel fur disbursal of pensionary benefits sha In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioner does not press the presen Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioner wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from er towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.342 of 2025 (O&M) of Decision: 19.02.2025 ......Petitioner ERS ....Respondents ESH MANUJA .G., Punjab. structions from Sh. Parminder Sing submits that a speaking order wi m the petitioner shall be passed with sel further assures that even interest o its shall be released within two week ertaking by the respondent(s), learne present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione er would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o , immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 Singh, er with d within erest on o weeks learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.02.20 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment