[2025:RJ-JP:34016] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4996/2025 Narain Ram Saini Son Of Shri Malaram Saini, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Plot No. 32, Ganesh Nagar, In Front Of Balaji Engineering College, Benar Road, Machada, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Development Authority, Through Secretary, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gopal Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 27/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a shop was allotted from the society to the petitioner in the year 1995. It is further submitted that part of the shop which was allotted, was already surrendered and one of the neighbors is allotted the said shop and an interim order is operational in his favor. Heard and considered. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances and upon analysis of the order dated 08.11.2024, this Court has noted that notices were issued under Section 72 of JDA qua encroachments on the road; that the approach of the petitioner with an inordinate delay; that the society which has allotted the shop is unapproved; that ownership rights qua the said piece of land is proven by the documents. The relevant extract of the said judgment is reiterated herein below:- [2025:RJ-JP:34016] (2 of 2) [CW-4996/2025] “izdj.k esa vihykFkhZ }kjk izLrqr QksVksxzkQ ftlesa fnukad 04@11@24 ds v[kckj dh izfr gS] ds voyksdu ls tkfgj gksrk gS fd ekSds ij orZeku esa nqdku ugha gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa izkFkhZ@vihykFkhZ dk dCtk gksus dk rF; Hkh lkfcr ugha gS] izek.k esa fe;kn lEcU/kh fcUnw Hkh varfuZfgr gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa varfje LFkxu fn;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr ugha gSA vihykFkhZ }kjk js- ;kfpdk la- 453@24 esa ikfjr LFkxu vkns’k dh izfr izLrqr dj leku izd`fr ds ekeys esa LFkxu vkns’k ikfjr djuk Hkh tkfgj fd;k gSA bl izdj.k esa fe;kn ds fcUnw ij vkns’k esa rF; mYysf[kr ugha gS rFkk dCts dks Hkh fookfnr fd;k tkuk tkfgj ugha gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa leku izd`fr dk ekeyk gksuk izdV ugha gksrk gS] mijksDr fLFkfr esa varfje LFkxu dh izkFkZuk vLohdkj dh tkrh gSA i=koyh fnukad 02@12@24 dks okLrs tcko ,oa cgl esa is’k gksA.” Taking note of the aforementioned, this Court is of the view that the concerned Tribunal, on facts, has found no case qua the petitioner and the order is justified and well- speaking. Thus this Court finds no reason to interfere in the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/44