Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 140487 (ALL)

JAGDISH PRASAD TIWARI and SAROJ KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE TRANSPORT APPELLATE TRIBUNLA THRU CHAIRMAN and 2 ORS.

WRIC/1002922/2007 · 2025-08-18

Pankaj Bhatia

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:48220 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1002922 of 2007 Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Tiwari And Saroj Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Transport Appellate Tribunla Thru Chairman And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Alok Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anwar Ashfaq,Mohd. Nazish Iqbal Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that the petitioners, who are joint holder of regular stage carriage permit for the route Datia-Lalitpur via Jhansi, were initially granted permit under Old Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 and thereafter New Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The same was extended by virtue of the directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. 3. It is stated that part of the route, on which the permit was granted, lies in the State of Uttar Pradesh and rest in the State of Madhya Pradesh. It is stated that at the time of grant of permanent permits, the time tables were also issued by the Secretary, State Transport Authority, U.P., Lucknow. The petitioner was aggrieved against the time permitted in terms of the time table, as such, the petitioners approached the respondents on which the order impugned came to be passed. 4. Considering the fact that time, which was granted pertains to the year 2004, the present petition is disposed off directing the respondent no.2 to revisit the matter keeping in view the change scenario and pass fresh orders keeping in view the entitlement of the petitioners in accordance with law. 5. It is made clear that fresh order so passed shall supersede the impugned order. Even otherwise considering the time lapsed, no good ground for interference is made out. 6. Let a copy of this order be furnished to the learned Standing Counsel to communicate the authority concerned to pass fresh order as directed above. 7. Till the fresh exercise is done by the respondents, the parties shall maintain status quo. Order Date :- 18.8.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench