1 2025:CGHC:14401 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1990 of 2025 1 - Narendra Prasad Gupta @ Narendra Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Vijay Prasad Gupta Aged About 43 Years Occupation - Service, Posted As Driver In The OfÏce Of Deputy Director Agriculture Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh R/o Old Bazar Para, Krishi Mandi Road, Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare And Bio-Technology Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Directorate Of Agriculture Chhattisgarh, Block-Ii, Second Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar Chhattisgarh 492002 3 - The Joint Director Agriculture Ambikapur, Division Surguja, Ambikapur, District Ambikapur (Surguja) Chhattisgarh SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.03.28 18:25:41 +0530 2 4 - The Deputy Director Agriculture Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Assistant Soil Conservation OfÏcer Surajpur, Sub-Division Baikunthpur, H.Q. Surajpur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Siddharth Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Shri S.S. Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 26.03.2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent to consider his representation submitted by him for regularization of service . 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is working as Driver in the OfÏce of respondent no. 4 on Collector Rate since 01.03.2007, but till date the case of the petitioner for regularization is not being considered by the respondent, in spite of the limited request of the petitioner. Learned counsel by referring representation dated 26.02.2021, which has been submitted by the petitioner to the respondent no. 2, submits that though the representation has been submitted on 26.02.2021, but no decision has been taken on the representation filed by the petitioner. 3 3. Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that if the petitioner again submit a representation to the respondent no. 2, the same shall be considered in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard both the parties and perused the pleadings and the representation submitted by the petitioner on 26.02.2021. 5. It appears from the pleadings of the writ petition that the petitioner is working as a driver on Collector rate since 01.03.2007 in the department of agriculture, however, the case of the petitioner has not been considered for regularization of his service, hence the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to submit a fresh representation reiterating the representation submitted on 26.02.2021 before the respondent no. 2 within a period of 15 days, if the petitioner will file the fresh representation, the same be considered in accordance with law within a further period of 50 days in accordance with law. 6. The writ petition is disposed of without commenting on the merit of the case. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib