ZEESHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
CRLA/1657/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajnish Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33298 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1657 of 2025 Appellant :- Zeeshan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Girish Kumar Pande,Prashant Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. On an objection raised by learned AGA that the victim has been impleaded by name, which could not have been done, Sri Prashant Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh. To which there is no objection by the learned AGA. In view of above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. As prayed by learned counsel for the appellant, office is
directed to return the certified copy/copies annexed with this appeal to learned counsel for the appellant after keeping the photocopy/photocopies of the same on record in accordance with law. .
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Akanksha Sri/- Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench