AT CHANDIGARH **** 249 CR-3952-2017 Date of Decision.:25.03.2025 Vinod Kumar Pe''oner Vs. Anil Kumar and Others Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: Mr. P.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Atul Lakhanpal, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shikha Charak, Advocate for respondent No.1. Ms. Himani Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Ashish Kapoor, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) In civil suit bearing No.CS-634-2015 tled as “Vinod Kumar v. Anil Kumar etc.” an applicaon under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for rejecon of the plaint, as moved by the defendant was allowed by the trial Court vide order dated 28.02.2017, which has been assailed before this Court by way of the present civil revision. Since the plaint was rejected, it amounts to decree against which the appeal should has been filed before the concerned first Appellate Court. Faced with the aforesaid situaon, learned counsel for the peoner has made a statement so as to withdraw this peon with liberty to file appeal before the concerned Appellate Court. Prayer is made to exempt the period spent during the pendency of the present revision. NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.03.25 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CR-3952-2017 In view of the aforesaid statement, present peon is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the peoner to file the appeal before the first Appellate Court. The me spent during the pendency of this peon shall be liable to be condoned by the first Appellate Court. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) JUDGE March 25, 2025 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2025.03.25 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document