IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CMPMO No. 212 of 2025. Decided on : 17 th June , 2025. Bhanuj Pathania ...Petitioner. Versus Neena Rakwal ....Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate. For the respondent: Nemo. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral). Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions to withdraw the instant petition on account of certain intervening circumstances. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (Satyen Vaidya) Judge 17th June, 2025. (jai) 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?