SMT. SINDHUTAI RANJEET DOKHE v. LAXMAN BAPPAJI NAIK AND OTHERS
CA/8533/2014 · 2025-07-14
Shri S G Chapalgaonkar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14042 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14042 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
55-Wp-5565-09+.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 55 WRIT PETITION NO. 5565 OF 2009 SMT. SINDHUTAI RANJEET DOKHE VERSUS LAXMAN BAPPAJI NAIK AND ORS. ... Mr. S. S. Wagh h/for Mr. Shelke Shivaji T., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Pahilwan Gautam J, Advocate for Respondent No.1 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8533 OF 2014 IN WP/5565/2009 .… CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
DATE : 14.07.2025 PER COURT :- IN CIVIL APPLICATION . Heard learned Advocates appearing for respective parties.
2. The present application is filed seeking permission to bring on record legal representatives of respondent No.2-Ramchandra Bappaji Naik, who expired on 13.01.2014 at Nashik.
3. Considering averments in application and submissions advanced, civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘A’.
4. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two (02) weeks from today. 1 of 2
(( 2 )) 55-Wp-5565-09+ IN WRIT PETITION . Mr. G. J. Pahilwan, learned Advocate appearing for respondents submits that respondent No.1-Laxman Bappaji Naik expired during pendency of petition. He has instructions to appear on behalf of legal representatives. However, petitioner has not taken necessary steps.
2. Learned Advocate appearing for petitioner undertakes to take steps within a period of two (02) weeks from today.
3. Stand over to 04.08.2025.
[ S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2