Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 140409 (ALL)

DILEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY.HOME DEEPT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/4127/2025 · 2025-05-27

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:31508 Court No. - 14 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4127 of 2025 Applicant :- Dileep Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy.Home Deept. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Adarsh Kumar Maurya,Alka Rani,Anuradha Kushwaha,Arun Kumar,Shubham Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Heard Shri Adarsh Kumar Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State as well as perused the record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now 528 of B.N.S.S.) by the applicant with the following prayer:- "अततः पप्रारर्थी / यप्राचची मप्राननचीय न्यप्रायप्रालय ससे वविनम्रतप्रा पपूविरक वनम्न पप्राररनप्रा करतप्रा हहै। 1- यह वक विप्राद सस0- 114792/2023 अ 0 सस0 1006/2018 अस० धप्रारप्रा- 406 आई०पची०सची० रप्रानप्रा गप्राजचीपपुर, जनपद- लखनऊ (सरकप्रार बनप्राम वदलचीप शपुक्लप्रा) मम दप्राखखल आररोप-पत्र ससलग्नक सस0-1 वि सम्मन आदसेश वदनप्रासक 19.10.2023 पप्राररत दप्रारप्रा न्यप्रायप्रालय वविशसेष मपुख्य न्यप्रायप्राधचीश कस्टम लखनऊ ससलग्नक सस०-2 आदसेश वदनप्रासक 19.10.2023 न्यप्रायप्रालय वविशसेष मपुख्य न्यप्रायप्राधचीश कस्टम लखनऊ दप्रारप्रा पप्राररत आदसेश वदनप्रासक 19.10. 2023 ससे सम्बनन्धत समस्त कप्रायरविप्राहची करो वनरस्त करतसे हहए यप्रावचकप्रा स्विचीकप्रार करनसे ककी कक पप्रा करसे। " 3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that liberty may be given to the applicant to file bail application before the trial court which may be decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2022) 10 S.C.R. 351 : (2022) 10 SCC 51 and Musheer Alam vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another, 2025 SCC OnLine SC 116 as also to prefer a discharge application before the court below and the same may be decided expeditiously. 4. Learned AGA has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicant. 5. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present application U/s 482 Cr.P.C. read with Section 528 BNSS is disposed of with liberty as prayed for and with a direction to the court below that if the applicant applies for bail before the Court concerned, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. 6. Liberty is also granted to the applicant to move discharge application before the court below and the same shall be decided expeditiously, in accordance with law, if there is no any other legal impediment. 7. Taking note of the facts of the case and also the observations made in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (Supra) and Musheer Alam (Supra), this Court is of the view that it would be appropriate to observe that it is expected from the Police Officer concerned that for a period of 30 days from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, he would not take any coercive action against the applicants in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 27.5.2025 Ashish Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench