SMT. MOHINI THRU. HER HUSBAND RINKU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
HABC/178/2025 · 2025-05-16
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140403 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:28929 Court No. - 11 Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 178 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Mohini Thru. Her Husband Rinku Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nalin Arora,Anubhav Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. This petition has come up through the second supplementary list on the permission granted yesterday i.e. on 15.05.2025, on account of urgency shown by learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Devanand Pandey, Advocate files his 'Vakalatnama' on behalf of respondent no.4, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent no.4 raised a preliminary objection that this petition has been filed with concealment of material facts because the next friend of the alleged detenue- Rinku is already married, therefore, the second marriage could not have been solemnized. Shri Nalin Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that this fact was not disclosed to him by the deponent and on the instructions of the deponent, who is present in court, he submits that he does not want to press this petition and prays for dismissal of the petition. To which there is no objection by learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for the respondent no.4. In view of above, this habeas corpus petition is accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. . ...........................................(Rajnish Kumar,J.)
Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Banswar Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench