Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10648 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
BA1 No. 2281 of 2025 Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Through V.C.)
1. Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA for the State.
3. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant.
4. Present applicant Hariom Tyagi, S/o Baburam is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 08.10.2024, bearing FIR No. 0357 of 2025, registered at P.S. Nehru Colony, District Dehradun, wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section2/3 of U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.
5.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the only on the basis of one case bearing FIR No. 325 of 2025 the applicant has been implicated in this FIR bearing FIR No. 0357 of 2025 though in FIR No. 325 of 2025 the applicant is already bailed out. He submits that there is no other case against the applicant.
6. On instructions Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned AGA for the State submits that apart from these cases earlier the applicant has also been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC, though he was acquitted by the trial court, and the state preferred an appeal against the order of acquittal, which is pending before the High Court.
7. Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant submits in FIR No. 325 of 2025 the applicant is closely associated with one Vinay Tyagi who is the main accused in FIR No. 325 of 2025 and Vinay Tyagi is the history sheeter involved
2025:UHC:10648 in more than 55 cases.
8. After hearing the arguments of the
learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that only on the basis of FIR No. 325 of 2025 the applicant has been implicated and in that FIR the applicant is already bailed out, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves for bail.
9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.
10. Let the applicant “Hariom Tyagi” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)
28.11.2025 Nahid