- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9527 WP No. 1635 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 1635 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MRS ANJINAMMA D/O LATE MUNISHAMAPPA W/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, K R PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAGHU PRASAD B S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIKAS SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGALURU-5 001 REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU-560001. 4. TAHSILDAR BENGALURU EAST TALUK KR PURAM, BENGALURU-560016 5. DODDAIAH S/O LATE ANEPPA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9527 WP No. 1635 of 2025 K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK 560083 6. MALLAPPA S/O LATE ANEPPA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 560083. 7. NAGARAJ S/O LATE ANEPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 560083. 8. MUNIYAMMA, D/O MUNIYAPPA W/O NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT K.CHANNASANDRA K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560083. 9. GULLAMMA W/O BEERE GOWDA D/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 560083 10. MUNIRATHNAMMA W/O NARAYANASWAMY D/O MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK 560083 11. CHANDRAMMA W/O BEERE GOWDA D/O MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9527 WP No. 1635 of 2025 BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560083 12. VENUGOPAL S/O LATE PILLAPPA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 083 13. DASAPPA S/O BELLAKKI RAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE K.R.PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE EAST TALUK-560 083 14. D.DEVANNA S/O DODDAIAH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, HORAMAVU POST BANGALORE-560 043 15. N.MOHAN, S/O NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, HORAMAVU POST BANGALORE-560 043 16. LAKSHMAMMA W/O A.NAGARAJA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/ATKALKERE VILLAGE, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE-560 043. 17. SMT PILLAMMA AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS W/O NARAYANAPPA D/O LATE ANEPPA R/AT YERAPPANAHALLI, BIDARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE 560 049 18. SMT. CHIKKAMUNIYAMMA - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:9527 WP No. 1635 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS W/O LATE HUTCHAPPA D/O LATE ANEPPA R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK 560 043 19. SMT. JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS W/O LATE BEERAPPA D/O LATE ANEPPA R/AT SHETTARA HALLI VISHWANATHAPURA POST, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562 110 20. SMT MUNIYAMMA W/O SEENAPPA, D/O LATE ANEPPA AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS R/AT KALKERE VILLAGE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, HORAMAVU POST, BANGALORE EAST TALUK 560 043 21. FRANCIS SAMARAJ.S AGED 48 YEARS S/O C. SELVARAJ, RESIDING AT NO 30, HBR LAYOUT RING ROAD, KALYAN NAGAR POST, BANGALORE 560043 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA., AGA FOR R-1 TOR -4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD. 24.03.2022 PASSED BY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN IN REVISION PETITION 433/2015-16 AND PRODUCED AS ANNX-E TO THE WRIT PETITION, ETC. - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:9527 WP No. 1635 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The revenue entries were mutated on the basis of the registered sale deeds, which lead to filing of an appeal by the petitioner on the ground that, in respect of the very lands in question, a suit in O.S.No.8912/2005 was pending consideration. 2. The Assistant Commissioner, however, dismissed the appeal on the ground that, once there was a sale deed, the Revenue Authorities were bound to give effect to the sale deed and the entries were required to be changed notwithstanding the fact that the suit was pending. 3. The Assistant Commissioner also stated that the petitioner was at liberty to approach the Revenue Authorities after the outcome of O.S.No.8912/2005. - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:9527 WP No. 1635 of 2025 This order of the Assistant Commissioner has been upheld by the Deputy Commissioner by dismissing the revision filed by the petitioner. 4. In the light of the fact that the Assistant Commissioner has already stated that the revenue entries made by the Authorities be subject to the ultimate result of the civil suit pending between the parties in O.S.No.8912/2005, the writ petition does not deserve to be entertained. 5. It is submitted that O.S.No.8912/2005 has been disposed of, as against which, a Regular First Appeal in RFA.No.2090/2022 is filed and the same is pending before this Court. 6. It is therefore obvious that the revenue entries that have been made by the Authorities would be subject to the ultimate result of this Court in RFA No.2090/2022. 7. This petition is accordingly disposed of. - 7 - NC: 2025:KHC:9527 WP No. 1635 of 2025 8. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12