Smt. Arti Sahu v. State of U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND Another
TACL/113/2025 · 2025-07-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140364 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 140364 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40452
Court No. - 7 Case :- TRANSFER APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 113 of 2025 Applicant :- Smt. Arti Sahu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shishir Pradhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. The office report indicates that the notice has not been served. The counsel for the applicant states that the service of notice was affected on the address as disclosed by the opposite party. Clearly the opposite party is avoiding the service.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned Counsel for the opposite party.
3. Present application under Section 24 of C.P.C. has been preferred by the applicant for transfer of Case No.880 of 2024 (Sanjeev Kumar vs. Arti Sahu) from the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Unnao to the equivalent Court at District Raebareli.
4. Considering the inconvenience being faced by the applicant, the present application is allowed. The aforesaid case pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Unnao is transferred to the equivalent Court at District Raebareli. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench