Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 140360 (ALL)

NIRMALA SRIVASTAVA v. UNION OF INDIA THRU. SECY. DEPTT. TELECOMMUNICATION MINISTRY COMMUNICATION AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/5361/2025 · 2025-05-16

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:29026 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5361 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nirmala Srivastava Respondent :- Union Of India Thru. Secy. Deptt. Telecommunication Ministry Communication And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Yadava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Nidhi Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Shri Saurabh Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Notices for opposite party No.1 has been accepted by Sri Anand Dwivedi, Advocate and for opposite parties No. 2 & 3 has been accepted by Ms. Nidhi Singh, Advocate. 3. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to implement the judgment and order dated 01.02.2024 passed in Writ Petition Writ- A No.695 of 2024 "Nirmala Srivastava vs. Union of India through Secy. Department of Telecommunication Ministry Communication, New Delhi and 2 others." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e., Additional General Manager/Unit Head, ITI Limited, Raebareli and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 6. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No.3 i.e., Additional General Manager/Unit Head, ITI Limited, Raebareli ventilating her grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her enclosing therewith the copy of her earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law and also in the light of judgment in re: Nirmala Srivastava (Supra) verifying its applicability on the issue in question, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 7. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 16.5.2025 Reena/- (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench