IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 5665 of 2024 Date of Decision: 27.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Champa Devi …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, fairly states that during the pendency of the present petition relief, as prayed for, has been granted to the petitioner and as such, present petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 27, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?