Court No. - 78 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13659 of 2007 Applicant :- Rajvir Singh Opposite Party :- C.B.I. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Singhal,Bharat Garg Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.S.Hajela,A.G.A. Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J. 1. List revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. despite the fact that there are two learned counsels on behalf of the applicant. Sri Gyan Prakash, learned counsel for the C.B.I. and Sri Ajay Singh, learned A.G.A-I for the State are present. 2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with the prayer to set-aside the impugned orders dated 1.2.07 passed by the learned Magistrate A.C.J.M. Court No.1 Muzaffar Nagar in Case No.109/9 of 2006 and order dated 10/5/07 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar in Criminal Revision No.66 of 2007 and may further be pleased to discharge the applicant in the interest of Justice and further to stay the further proceedings of aforesaid case. 3. On 27.9.2023 following order was passed by coordinate Bench of this court:- "1. None appears on behalf of the applicant even in the revised call. 2. The instant case relates to an incident of the year 1995 and the instant application was filed in the year 2007, which was entertained on 26-06-2007 and on the prayer made on behalf of the applicant the matter was adjourned. On 18-07-2007, the matter was adjourned and the further proceedings were stayed against the applicant. Since then the matter could not be listed and it was subsequently listed on 06-01-2011 and none was present on behalf of the applicant on that date, therefore, the instant application was dismissed on merits vide order dated 06-01-2011 in the following terms. "List has been revised. None appears for the applicant. Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the impugned order as well as the other materials brought on record. This application is directed against the order dated 10-05-2007 passed by the District Judge, Muzaffarnagar in Criminal Revision No. 66 of 2007 by which the revision preferred by the applicant against the order dated 01-02-2007 passed by the Magistrate by which the discharge application was rejected, has also been dismissed. I have carefully gone through the impugned order and find that the order of the court below is based upon relevant considerations and supported by cogent reasons and does not suffer from any illegality, infirmity or perversity warranting any interference by this Court. The application lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed." 3. Subsequently on the application made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the said order was recalled on 17-04-2015. 4. Vide order dated 23-07-2021, the interim order was extended. 5. In view thereof, put up this matter peremptorily on 11-10-2023 in the additional cause list." 4. The records show that there has been repeated non-appearance on behalf of applicant. 5. Since there is no representation on behalf of the applicant, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. The records do not show existence of any interim order today. 7. Office to communicate this order to trial court concerned within two weeks from today. 8. Pending application (s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (Samit Gopal, J.) Order Date :- 28.2.2025 Gaurav Kuls Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad