2025:JHHC:21630 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3729 of 2025 ---- Vidya Sharma, Son of Sukhari Sharma, aged about 65 years, Resident of Vill- Chandauli, Post-Chainpur, PS-Goreyakothi, District-Siwan, Bihar …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The Union of India through Secretary, the Ministry of Transport and Highways, Government of India, Transport Bhawan, P.O., P.S., Parliament Street, District-New Delhi. 2. The Chairman, National Highways Authority of India, B-402. Road No.4C, P.O Ashok Nagar, P.S. Argora, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand 3. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Finance, Bihar Secretariat, P.O &P.S-Sachivalaya, Patna 4. The Superintendent, Central Good and Service Tax (GST) Hazaribagh Range, P.O & P.S-Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh 5. The Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Saran Circle-1, P.O, P.S & District- Chapra, Bihar 6. M/S Virat Construction Company, through its Managing Director namely, Mr. Darshan Upapadhyay, aged about 54 years, having its registered office at Address 1. H/O Baldeo Shaw at Pawai, P.O.- Pandeybara, P.S- Chauparan Pawai, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand Address 2. A/815 Siddhi Vinayak Towers behind DCP Office S.G. Road Highway, Makarba Ahmadabad Gujarat - 380051 …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Milan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Amrit Raj Kisku, AC to G.A-V For the Respondent-NHAI : Mrs. Sweety Topno, Advocate For the Respondent Nos.3 & 5 : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, AC to G.A (Bihar) For the Respondent No.4 : Mr. Parth S.A Swaroop Pati, Advocate ---- 03/Dated: 04th August, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- “(a) For issuance of direction upon the respondent to release the pending amount of Rs.79,76,046/- for the work done under the contract for the six laning of Bihar Jharkhand Border (Chordaha) to Gohar Section of NH2 project. (b) For direct the respondent to compensate the petitioner with interest on such not paid amount. 2025:JHHC:21630 2 W.P(C) No.3729 of 2025 (c) For direct the respondents to make necessary arrangements so that the amount not paid by the respondents against the work done by the petitioner may be credited into the account of petitioner. (d) For stay the recovery proceedings initiated (Annexure-7) by the respondents No. 5.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby, disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/- Uploaded