GOBINDA RAJBANGSHI AND ANR. v. SMTI BHASWATI DAS AND 3 ORS.
Cont.Cas(C)/349/2024 · 2025-07-15
Soumitra Saikia
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14032 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14032 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010125682024
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/349/2024 GOBINDA RAJBANGSHI AND ANR.
S/O LATE GANGARAM RAJBANGSHI R/O SARBODOI NAGAR, HOUSE NO. 14, BARSOJAI P.O. BASISTHA P.S. BASISTHA DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM 2: SATYAJIT SEN S/O LATE SUDHIR RANJAN SEN R/O M.K. ENCLAVE APARTMENT
B.G. COLONY PRAGJYOTISH NAGAR
BYE LNE -1
P.O. MALIGAON P.S. MALIGAON DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSA VERSUS SMTI BHASWATI DAS AND 3 ORS.
SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SOIL CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT, BLOCK-A, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6.
2:JAYANT NARLIKAR COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6.
Page No.# 2/3 3:CHANDAN RAJAN DAS DIRECTOR
SOIL CONSERVATION ASSAM BHUMI SANGRAKSHAN BHAWAN
1ST FLOOR R.G. BARUA ROAD
GUWAHATI ASSAM-781005 4:RAMENDRA NATH DAS MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM PLANTATION CROPS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
OPPOSITE SARUSAJAI NATIONAL COMPLEX SAWKUCHI NATIONAL HIGHWAY-37 LAKHARA GUWAHATI-781034 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BORUA, MR A B DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : MR A CHALIHA(R-2), T CHAKMA (R1, R3, R4),P HAZARIKA (R1, R3, R4),MR. S R RABHA (1,3,4),MS A DAS (R-1,3,4),MS. L WANGSA (R-1,3,4),MRS. R S DEURI (R-1,3,4),MR D S DEKA (R-1,3,4),MR P NAYAK(R-2),MR. B GOGOI(R-2)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 16.07
.2025 Mr. A. B. Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the directions contained in the order dated 05.02.2024 passed in WP(C) No. 1557/2023 has since been complied with and the petitioners do not wish to press the writ petition any further.
Page No.# 3/3 The learned counsel for the respondent has placed before the Court a communication dated 15.07.2025, whereby it is seen that arrear salary amounting to Rs.1.76901 lakhs has been released to both the writ petitioners. In that view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to proceed any further in the matter, accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed. Notices issued stand recalled. JUDGE Comparing Assistant