Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14031 (ORI)

M/S PRATISTHA AUTOMOBILES, BBSR v. PRESIDING OFFICER, DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK

WP(C)/5425/2025 · 2025-02-24

K R Mohapatra, Sanjay Kumar Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 5425 OF 2025 Pratistha Automoniles, Bhubaneswar …. Petitioner None -versus- Presiding Officer, Debts Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack and another …. Opp. Parties Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA ORDER Order No. 11.07.2025 I.A. No.5796 of 2025 2. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call. 3. This I.A. has been filed to modify the order dated 24th February, 2025 by which W.P.(C) No.5425 of 2025 was disposed of. 4. It is stated in the I.A. that instead of directing disposal of S.A. No.199 of 2023, it is directed disposal of O.A. No.226 of 2018, in the order dated 24th February, 2025, by which the writ petition was disposed of. 5. Perused the order dated 24th February, 2025. 6. On perusal, it appears that the writ petition was filed for early disposal of SA No.199 of 2023 filed by the Petitioner under Section 17(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 14-Jul-2025 16:43:29 Signature Not Verified of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. In the concluding paragraph of the order dated 24th February, 2025, this Court directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Cuttack to dispose of SA No.199 of 2023 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of copy of the said order, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, if the same is still pending and there is no legal impediment. 7. On perusal of the order sheet, this Court finds that no modification of the order, as prayed for, is necessary. 8. Accordingly, the I.A. stands dismissed. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge (S.K. Mishra) ms Judge