- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11242 WP No. 1612 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 1612 OF 2022 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN: M/S RANGANATH ENTERPRISES VISHAL NAGARA, 3RD CROSS RANGANATHANILAYA BELLARY-583 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SMT. M. SREEDEVI MEKALA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MOHAMMED TAHIR A.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE CLASSES AND TENDER APPELLATE AUTHORITY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA, DISTRICT TENDER ACCEPTING AUTHORITY, FOR SUPPLY OF FOOD MATERIALS TO PRE-METRIC AND POST-METRIC HOSTELS/ASHRAMA SCHOOLS, COMING UNDER BACKWARD CLASSES AND MINORITY DEPARTMENTS, CHITRADURGA-577 501. Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11242 WP No. 1612 of 2022 3. SRI SHIRADISAI PROVISIONAL STORE, NO.1056 NEAR MUNCIPAL COLLEGE, M.G ROAD, CHIKKABALLAPURA -562 101 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. SRIMAL SANTOSH 4. NAVEEN TRADERS, NO. HIG-22, BAPUGOWDA NAGAR SHAPUR, YADGIR DISTRICT-585 223. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI. SHARAN REDDY. 5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND MEMBER SECRETARY TO TENDER COMMITTEE, CHITRADURGA, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-577 501. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHAMANTH NAIK, HCGP FOR R1, R2 AND R5, SRI. I.R. BIRADAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4, R3-SERVED BUT UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER IN APPEAL PASSED BY R1 - APPELLATE AUTHORITY AS PER THE DIRECTION IN W.P.NO.14786/2021 AT ANNEXURE-M1 AND DIRECT THE R1, 2 AND 5 TO ALLOW THE PETITIONER TO SUPPLY FOOD MATERIALS TO THE HOSTELS AS PER WORK ORDER DATED 03.10.2020 AT ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11242 WP No. 1612 of 2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 107